King Arthur: Legend of the Sword

2017

Action / Adventure / Drama / Fantasy

534
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 28%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 73%
IMDb Rating 6.8 10 151561

Synopsis


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Downloaded 1,734,675 times
August 02, 2017 at 04:38 PM

Director

Cast

Charlie Hunnam as Arthur
Jude Law as Vortigern
Guy Ritchie as Inn Owner
3D.BLU 720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
1.93 GB
1920*800
English
PG-13
23.976 fps
2hr 6 min
P/S 7 / 32
932.25 MB
1280*720
English
PG-13
23.976 fps
2hr 6 min
P/S 42 / 574
1.92 GB
1920*1080
English
PG-13
23.976 fps
2hr 6 min
P/S 53 / 495

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by kmvandenburg-651-254887 7 / 10

A legendary story with a new plot

The heart of King Arthur and Excalibur is still there. The underdog finding his way through a journey of self discovery to become the legendary king that wheels the sword. Guy Richie's version gives this story a edgy version with great street fights and battles and a villian to hate in Jude Law's protrayal of an evil King driven by desire of power. Charlie Hunnam's as the street hustler Arthur is a pleasant and refreshing take on the known character. The only issue I had was that the story felt clunky. The pacing between the character development, story conflict and action was never evenly represented. It had moments of greatness and it just fell short of being a great movie, but this beginning story is enjoyable to watch and sets the stage for possible adventures for King Arthur and this Knights.

Reviewed by matezajkas 3 / 10

Good try, but shockingly disappointing.

I really don't know who or what to thank that i didn't see this movie in the theaters. I never saw this movie until today but i feel like i did like a thousand times. I like Guy Ritchie's works, also i am not really familiar with the arthurian tales, but to compare this pile of nonsense to Lord of the Rings is unbelievably anger inducing.

I really don't get why people give this 6+ stars, it could only go up so high if you dismiss all the factors that makes this hunk of crap what it is and you are left with Guy Ritchie's name and the music. Which were the only redeeming qualities. I can only think that, like everywhere, shills walk among us. Let's get to the story, shall we?

Oh boy... even with the limited knowledge i have about the original story and the roughly 2 minute research i made after the movie, i can say with confidence that this is not a remake of any sort. What was wrong with romans? I get it, an other movie where you have to brute force nazi-like imagery to make the bad guy a bad guy because you don't have enough time to write depth, but why change the romans to ninjas with unpractical metal masks? Oh yeah... so deep and original. All of this reminded me of 300, but at least that movie was entertaining and from beginning to end was fully meant to be fictional and was also out of it's mind. This was a weak attempt to take Snatch and place it in medieval times. And it failed miserably.

But again, even if you are now a die hard fan of this movie and find it entertaining, giving it 9-10 stars? You are saying this movie is better than Reservoir dogs, Goodfellas, even Snatch and LotR? If yes and still maintain this opinion, you should consider taking changes in you life and talk to people who are from flesh and bone, they can help.

Reviewed by clintmaffett 1 / 10

garbage

Typical garbage. a country of idiots raised on crap will like it.

Read more IMDb reviews

137 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment